2 e-mails par semaine : tarifs, réglementation et conseils. Désinscription à tout moment.
L’abonnement est actif immédiatement — nous envoyons un court message que vous pouvez résilier à tout moment.
Comment l’exposition locative, le coût de reconstruction d’une charpente en bois et la franchise font grimper la prime — et quoi vérifier avant le renouvellement
An annual premium of $2,438 against the $2,140 median for the same profile — that 14% gap is not just a number. It is a mirror of how Ontario home insurance is being repriced in 2026, and what it implies for households about to renew.
The portfolio median for a primary home + two rented Toronto condos sits at $2,140. The actual policy in this review landed at $2,438. The 298-dollar delta breaks down into three things: the two rental lines carry a 30–40% surcharge over primary occupancy; the Pickering wood-frame rebuild cost (4,017 sq ft) sits on the higher end of Ontario rebuild tables; and the deductible of $2,500 per location is on the moderate side — many portfolios run $1,000–$1,500 deductible and pay proportionally more in premium.
The 14% gap is therefore not an indictment of any single carrier — it is the carrier accurately pricing the combined risk: rental exposure + wood-frame rebuild exposure + moderate deductible. A different bundle with the same carrier would have landed closer to the median.
A $2,500 deductible is the lever that makes a portfolio affordable. It transfers every claim under $2,500 to the household — that is roughly 80% of property claims by count, even though they are only 20% of dollars. The headline premium falls; the household absorbs the operational risk.
The danger is that emergency funds are not co-designed with the deductible. A household that does not actually hold $7,500 in liquid assets for a $2,500 deductible × 3 locations is exposed to under-insurance they cannot claim back. The deductible is a price, not a feature.
Most Ontario home policies include an 80% coinsurance condition: if Coverage A (Dwelling) is below 80% of the rebuild cost, claims are paid proportionally, not in full. The policy stays in force; the household gets 70–80% of the loss and discovers the gap only at claim time.
The pricing implication is straightforward: most Ontario homes are priced assuming a Coverage A at or near the 80% threshold. A 4,017 sq ft wood-frame in Pickering at $1.56M is right at the edge. A small rebuild-cost inflation shock — and we have seen 18–24% year-over-year on materials and labour since 2022 — pushes the policy below 80%, and the coinsurance penalty activates.
Two-line rentals sit on most Ontario home portfolios without the owner realising it. A basement apartment, a coach house, or a condo you rent while working abroad — each adds a rental surcharge that is not always visible until renewal.
Across Ontario, the rental surcharge ranges 30–60% over primary-occupancy rates. Combined with Coverage E (personal liability) which has to extend to tenant injuries, the rental side of the book is now the fastest-growing part of Ontario home insurance.
In a portfolio with two rentals, a $1.5M primary, a $2,500 deductible and a 14% above-median premium, the broker is doing four things the direct channel is not: comparing rebuild estimates against the rate engine, modelling U1/U2/U3 splits, flagging Coverage G and umbrella top-ups, and underwriting the rein-statement exposure on preauthorized payments.
None of these are algorithmic. Each requires someone to look at the declarations page, ask the right questions, and push back at the carrier when the rebuild estimate drifts. The broker line item is the cheapest line on the policy and the one most likely to pay itself back at claim time.
Three pressures are converging: rebuild-cost inflation (8–12% per year on materials and labour), rental exposure rising across Ontario, and the auto-hike cycle still working through homeowner portfolios that bundled cars and homes. Net effect for 2027: another 4–8% on median home premiums in Ontario, more in rental-heavy bundles.
The defensive moves for next renewal: lock Coverage A to a fresh rebuild estimate (not the purchase price), reduce the deductible if your emergency fund can support it, raise Coverage G to $5K, add an umbrella policy. None of these decisions is large in absolute dollars. All of them require a broker sitting in the room.
Three drivers, in order: rebuild-cost inflation (8–12% per year on materials and labour since 2022), more severe weather events (storm and water claims rising every year), and the 80% coinsurance rule quietly forcing more frequent mid-term adjustments as Coverage A drifts below threshold. None of the three is reversing in 2026–2027.
Almost always — but the trade is not symmetric. Doubling the deductible from $1,000 to $2,500 typically cuts premium by 8–15%, while your out-of-pocket per claim doubles. The calculation is only worth it if you actually hold the deductible amount in liquid cash. Otherwise the cheaper premium is funded by exposure you cannot pay.
Three things: confirm "Rented to another Party" is on the declarations page (not "Primary"), ask for a Coverage G bump to $5K, and add an umbrella policy at $5M. Two rentals on a single homeowner policy mean landlord-tenant disputes land on Coverage E (personal liability) — which is capped at $1M without an umbrella.
Three signals: they ask for a rebuild estimate (not just the purchase price) before each renewal; they flag Coverage A vs Single Amount of Insurance on the declarations page; they bring Coverage G and umbrella to the table without you asking. If none of those happens at renewal, you are buying price, not coverage.